![]() |
| http://www.impawards.com/2014/posters/into_the_woods_ver12.jpg |
One of America’s favorite pastimes is
sitting back and watching a film with friends and family. This is becoming more
and more common as the technologies advance and new and/or improved movies are
being produced. A film that was more or less recently released and sold very
well was Into The Woods directed by
Stephen Sondheim. According to Jon Lisi, who, after viewing the film, wrote a
review of it titled There Aren’t Many
Reasons to Go ‘Into the Woods,’ the film was not worth the audience’s
attention. This inspired me to watch the film myself because I have been
wanting to and I needed to know if what Lisi said was true.
First of all, I very much enjoyed the
film. On the other hand, after reading Lisi’s review, I learned something new
about the film that I had not previously noticed. Mr. Lisi mentions that there
were no solo presentations of song during the entire film, which is shocking
due to the fact that it is a musical. Also, the film has seemingly two separate
endings: one where everyone has what they need to live happily ever after and
one where everything goes awry again. This would be less of a disappointment if
the rise in action had continued through the first ‘ending’ and climaxed at the
next scene with a giant.
Although these parts were slightly out
of context, they did not take enough away from the storyline for anyone to
claim it is not ‘worth the audience’s attention.’ This claim would mean that
the entire movie was compromised, which I strongly disagree with. Lisi did not
seen to understand many of the more symbolic aspects of the film that made it
so wonderful, not to mention the amazing musical aspects heard throughout.
Therefore, I understand what Mr. Lisi is saying, but I do not agree.
Personally, I was not always allowed to
watch things related to magic or princesses, so now that I am an adult and can
watch these tales, I get very excited. I find it hard to dislike films and/or
productions that endorse happily ever after, princes and princesses, or magic
because it was something I always just had to imagine when others brought it
up. Overall, this contributed to my liking of Into The Woods.
As a result of the fact that the author
did not enjoy the film, they failed to mention any good qualities or aspects of
the film. One of these is the symbolism throughout the production. Every
fairytale story in this story is effectively depicted as the true stories as
well as a few new aspects. Also, Lisi should have included his thoughts on the
musical aspects. In my opinion, the cast was perfect for the voices in the
music as well as each character’s personality.
Though the review by Jon Lisi was
entirely against the film Into The Woods
and claimed it was worth no one’s time, I still feel that it was an effective
and enchanting film. Overall, this was a good movie and, I believe, was most
definitely worth my time.

I have never been a fan of musicals and I feel that it would be interesting to have a movie where there are no solo parts. Also, I do agree with you over the fact that the reviewer should have included what the movie did well. Even when you write a negative review, I feel that good attributes should be included. Did you like that there was no solo parts?
ReplyDelete